[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

28246: Re: [MUD-Dev] Programming Languages.

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Peter \"Pietro\" Rossmann" <peter.rossmann@telia.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 00:30:34 +0200
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
"Matthew Estes" <matt@maintree.com> wrote:

> experience doing a MUD in Erlang and what they think about it.

> Erlang seems ideal for this kind of thing as it was designed for
> writing reliable distributed client-server systems and is used in

i saw your prior post about Erlang. I know they are using it in
Ericsson, but i find it too proprietary and unsupported.  if you
want to have some extravaganzza, you can try at least something
standardised :) as for example Chill.  CHILL is a block-structured
compiled language, standardized by the ITU

  http://cgibin.erols.com/ziring/cgi-bin/cep/cep.pl?_key=Chill

Even though my company is using it, i would choose quite other path
- standard c++ with some extra wrappers, such as real time
corba. this is the path i am examining right now. and yeah, UML
too. big industry design for small muds :)

Pietro
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev