[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
13203: RE: [MUD-Dev] Declaration of the Rights of Avatars
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Paul Schwanz - Enterprise Services <Paul.Schwanz@east.sun.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Geoffrey said:
> If we buy the argument that rights in the vw can never be more than
> favours granted the players by the Creator, then you raise an
> interesting point. Would it not be a more successful exercise to use
> the theory of divine (as opposed to natural) rights when trying to
> formulate a Declaration of the Rights of Avatars?
Since the vw is not merely co-existent to the rw, but rather a subset of it, the
divine right of the creator of the vw would be subject to whatever natural or
divine rights exist in the rw. Doesn't this bring us right back to the OOC
issues which inspired Raph's original post, since divine rights are IC, but
Divine and Natural Rights are OOC? :-)
--Phinehas
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"All things are permissalbe,
but not all things are expedient."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev