[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

25928: Inspecting (was Re: [MUD-Dev] Total Annilation of Downtime)

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Amanda Walker <amanda@alfar.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:07:03 -0500
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On 12/14/02 6:21 PM, Brad McQuaid <bmcquaid@cox.net> wrote:

> That's very true.  The challenge of EQ was to take inspiration
> from a very compelling yet very niche style of game (text combat
> MUDs), attach graphics to it, develop our own world, make some
> adjustments to gameplay here and there, PR and Market it as
> professionally as possible, and see if it would be commercially
> viable and mainstream (mainstream as far as computer games go,
> mind you).

And indeed, it turned out rather well.  I don't mean to be
criticizing those decisions--revenue is the best reward, and
EverQuest definitely set the benchmark for MMORPGs.  I was
responding with a personal supporting anecdote when the observation
that some people reacted poorly to the UI's message came up in
conversation.

> The result, despite it being far more successful than we'd ever
> dreamed (still over 400,000 active, I think), was still a game
> with some hard edges, especially for people who'd never played a
> game like it before.

In my case, more of an annoyance than a "hard edge".  Once I
realized that the message meant that someone had simply
right-clicked on my avatar, I became less annoyed--this just wasn't
initially obvious.

Amanda Walker


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev