[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
13485: RE: [MUD-Dev] Simpson's "In-Game Economics of UO"
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Raph Koster" <rkoster@austin.rr.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:46:59 -0500
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu [mailto:mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu]On Behalf Of
> Sellers, Michael
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 4:57 PM
> To: 'mud-dev@kanga.nu'
> Subject: RE: [MUD-Dev] Simpson's "In-Game Economics of UO"
>
>
> Raph wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu
> > [mailto:mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu]On Behalf Of
> > > Charles Hughes
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 2:19 PM
> > > To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> > > Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Simpson's "In-Game Economics of UO"
> > >
> > > a mule could crank out many breastplates in a year,
> > > but the more breastplates available, the lower the price that could be
> > > charged.
> >
> > Players hate this and report it as a bug.
> If the game were more of an economic one than a "kill monster get loot"
one,
> their expectations could be set differently (see for example the old game
> MULE).
As a total MULE addict, I can say with a fairly high degree of confidence
that it was hard as the dickens to LOSE money in regular play. It's a game
about who makes more, and going bankrupt just doesn't happen.
-Raph
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev