[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
15179: [MUD-Dev] Child animations in MUDs (UO)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Brett <bmansf20@scu.edu.au>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:26:21 +1000
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Recently I have been pushing to have various child animations re-instated
into UO(private shards), specifically for myself and others to use them as
another 'race' (ie dwarfs), I don't know why Origin removed them in the
first place but I assume because of PK'ing.
From reading this list over the last year or so, the abuse of everything
and anything that admins do is just about certain, thus I am wondering if
this idea to re-instate the child animations is actually a good idea...
So really my question is: Should I attempt to replace the animations
knowing that they were removed for good(?) reason? Or is it up the shard
admins to decide if they want this on their own shards?
Also: Am I always going to be partially responsibe if this goes badly (eg:
PK'ing child shard) (I think yes).
I think it is very similar to the argument that TV violence is bad etc...
(AFAIK it would be amazingly simple to return the child animations to UO,
as Origin did not overwrite the animations, just blanked them out)
er, also this is concerning non-Origin shards, using various UO-emulator
shard software, so as to the legality of the whole thing, well it's
probably bad :(
Well I just hope this is on topic...
Brett
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev