[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

21203: Re: [MUD-Dev] RP in EQ?

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Vincent Archer <archer@frmug.org>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:13:55 +0200
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
According to Daniel.Harman@barclayscapital.com:

> Its going to be a horrible fusion of people who like the new rule
> set (which has some merit), and roleplay extremists who think
> roleplaying is sub pulp-fantasy application of 'thees', 'thous'
> and 'prithees'.
 
> It makes me shudder.

It looks like a meld of Siege Perilous-esque ruleset with that
horror of horror, the AD&D alignments resurrected.

Alas, the evils have a field day again: Ogres make the best
warriors, Dark Elves make the 2nd best casters (and even that is
hotly debated), and passable clerics (not the best), their
alignments are compatible, and they start with a common langage
("Dark Speech") that is not the "Common" which was removed (I hope
Verant remember this, but I haven't seen it mentioned, so it might
have slipped in).

Looks like the Zek servers all over again.

--
	Vincent Archer			Email:	archer@frmug.org

All men are mortal.  Socrates was mortal.  Therefore, all men are Socrates.
							(Woody Allen)
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev