[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
13164: RE: [MUD-Dev] Declaration of the Rights of Avatars
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Raph Koster" <rkoster@austin.rr.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:38:12 -0500
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu [mailto:mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu]On Behalf Of
> Par Winzell
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 6:58 PM
> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Declaration of the Rights of Avatars
>
> This constitutes the entireity of our players' rights. Yet I would say
> we have one of harshest traditions around in dealing with e.g. wizards
> snooping on players, administrator abuse, &c. I also believe that as a
> consequence of this, our player has more trust in its administration
> than I've seen in many other a place.
I would wager that you therefore have either a written or unwritten set of
rules about how to administrate, then. Can you post said rules for
comparison to the rights doc?
> When a player complains to me of his 'rights' being violated, I see red
> and likewise when someones suggests to me that there's something I ought
> do because it's my -job-.
So when a player tells you to do something you know to be the right thing,
but they use the wrong terminology for said right thing, eg, "rights", you
see red?
Why be so hung up on the nomenclature?
-Raph
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev