[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
28047: RE: [MUD-Dev] Architecture (Cell Rebalancing)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Rossmann Peter <peter.rossmann@siemens.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:39:43 +0200
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 06:38:23 -0700
Daniel.Harman@barclayscapital.com wrote:
> I'd argue that this approach is over engineered. If player density
...
> Of course an alternative is to look at non-spacial paritioning. Do
> cell's need to reflect geographical position? Its certainly not
> required, but when you start factoring in AI navigation, object
> interactions etc it seems that geographic association is needed at
> least somewhere in the system.
It was overengeneered. I have tried to draw new design here:
http://w1.860.telia.com/~u86015984/MMO-Grid-Cluster-v2.jpg
all elements are actually arrays of the same elements.
I am not sure about the AI manager. Should it interact with
everything thru World Manager? Or should it be able to run it's own
queries on spatial database and modify the Object database directly?
Pietro
PS: Those boxes are not computers, those are separated elements - or
modules. If one takes a SMP computer such as Sun v880, it could run
all on one computer. (but who would pay for such a beast? :))
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev