[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
12164: Re: [MUD-Dev] Collecting ideas for a MUD server... (fwd)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 09:11:59 -0800
References: [1] [2] [3] [4] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 04:29:52 -0600
Greg Miller <gmiller@classic-games.com> wrote:
> J C Lawrence wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:18:18 -0600 Greg Miller
>> <gmiller@classic-games.com> wrote:
>>> NT4 is tolerable for mud use, and Windows 2000 has already
>>> developed a strong reputation for stability.
>> Please be careful of the difference between "security" in any
>> absolute sense, and a "reputation for security".
> And also be careful with the difference between "reputation for
> security" and "reputation for stability" :)
Aaargh. I'll confess that I've come to think of them as almost
synonymous in a world of DoS attacks.
Touche.
--
J C Lawrence Home: claw@kanga.nu
----------(*) Other: coder@kanga.nu
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev