[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
113: Re: mud grammar
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Nathan Yospe <yospe@hawaii.edu>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 13:37:49 -1000
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Thu, 20 Mar 1997 claw@null.net wrote:
:On 20/03/97 at 02:08 AM, "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc@ix.netcom.com>
:said:
:
:>I disliked how iterators are used in STL. They seem rather clumsy to
:>me.
:
:I really like OpenClass' cursor model here. It's very simple and
:clean with clear cut semantics of when a cursor is valid or not.
:Iterators I can get along with, especially once I customise them, but
:I'll agree their not the most natural of beasts.
Anyone else here playing with NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP? I'm doing it mainly
because my job is gonna take a sharp swing in the direction of Rhapsody
development soon... but I'm trying to make Physmud++ compatible with the
Rhapsody/NeXT paradigms via another set of wrappers...
__ _ __ _ _ , , , ,
/_ / / ) /_ /_) / ) /| /| / /\ First Light of a Nova Dawn
/ / / \ /_ /_) / \ /-|/ |/ /_/ Final Night of a World Gone
Nathan F. Yospe - University of Hawaii Dept of Physics - yospe@hawaii.edu