[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
30818: Re: [MUD-Dev] Distributed State Systems
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Michael Tindal <mtindal@paradoxpoint.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:52:58 -0400
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 18:33 -0600, Bruce Mitchener wrote:
> Perhaps you're looking at the wrong problem entirely.
> Why not just not crash?
> That's a far nicer solution to your problem and is pretty
> feasible.
> You can design your system that it runs on a stable kernel that
> never changes and so that the code running above it won't trigger
> a segfault.
Even in a non-stable provided environment, sandboxing code can
prevent crashing. I've already done that :). Everything outside of
the very very core stuff runs in a sandboxed environment under a
highly stress- tested core kernel. The goal isnt so much to prevent
crashes (its more of a side-effect than a goal), its to allow
scalability. I thank you all for your suggestions, however, since I
started this thread I've done a lot more thinking and redesign so I
think I have the solution (and in case I don't, I have about 3 more
to think about) to my problem.
Again, thanks for all of your support!
Mike
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev