[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

22608: RE: Re Moved: Re: [Meta] Re: [MUD-Dev] EQ RPG

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Jason Booth" <zombie.shakespeare@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:33:31 -0500
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Just wanted to throw a wrench into the works.  After reading many of
the messages discussing good and evil, it has become interesting
that "evil" has taken on the characteristics of strong, well
organized groups while "good" has been characterized as highly
independent and disorganized individuals (vigilanties?).  I mean,
what really seems to be happening here is that most people are
playing "good" characters (i.e. personas looking to further the
goals of the society or strongest group) while only a few people are
playing "evil" characters (i.e. lone gunmen).  Of course, this all
comes down to whether you view groups as good or evil, and that you
subscribe to such a rigid binary outlook on social development in
general.

_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev