[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
8621: [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud, Gamora and Casbah
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Chris Gray <cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 20:27:50 -0600
Organization: Kanga.Nu
[ApplePiMan:]
>>(Small voice: I still want to do it O-O. Wanto! Wanto!!! :)
>
>Did I miss something? I didn't think any decision had been made on that
>yet...
If it did go by, I missed it too! I've been muttering about deciding
what an appropriate object model for the MUD DB might be, but I sure
haven't said there shouldn't be one. I think I've also said that we
should think about whether the DB object model needs to be the same
as any object model that might be used in the implementation language.
I've also said I don't think much about the in-MUD language being a
subset of C++. Perhaps some of these were misconstrued?
--
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA