[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

1571: Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 20 May 97 13:45:25 -0700
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
In <3.0.32.19970518132921.009a5fe4@mail.tenetwork.com>, on 05/18/97 
   at 01:31 PM, Jeff Kesselman <jeffk@tenetwork.com> said:


>> From: coder@ibm.net
>>
>> Side notes:  This may be changing.  There are two promises in the wind 
>> for this area:  Cable modems: which would mean this machine would be 
>> online 24hrs a day and I'd finally be able to offer a real FTP/Web site >>et al

>Um. not unless it was a VERY slow one.

>Virtually all cable modems are asymetric, whiel they provide
>(theoreticl;y) great downstream bandwidth to the user, they provide
>not much mroe thena standard modem back upstream. (Soem even USE a
>seperate telephone loine and modem, depending on whether the cable
>comapny is willign to install the back-channel equiptment on their
>net or not.)

In this specific case (when it comes to my area) they are offering a
fixed IP address, and (as you say) shared upstream bandwidth.  Judging
from the effective upstream bandwidth a friend is experiencing with
the same company in the LA basin (where there are many subscribers to
the net service), effective upstream bandwidth usually runs
equivalently to a dedicated bonded ISDN pair (128Kbps).

As happens said friend is also running a web site from his home
machine -- thru-put is quite respectable.

>Cable mdoems are another one of those misunderstood technologies that
>everyone is playing wishful-thinking on...

Yup, but this is one of the better offerings AFACT.

--
J C Lawrence                           Internet: claw@null.net
(Contractor)                           Internet: coder@ibm.net
---------------(*)               Internet: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...