[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

481: Re: [MUD-Dev] Levels and Goals [was Alright..IF your gonan do

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Jeff Kesselman <jeffk@tenetwork.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 21:05:44 -0700
Organization: Kanga.Nu
At 07:20 PM 6/3/97 PST8PDT, jclawrence wrote:
>>In order to get the kidns of numbers you need.. we look for 200+ new
>>users per day at TEN .. you can't have an entry process that is
>>either labor intensive or unscalable.
>
>Nope.  The problem is not the solution ,its the presentation.  You can
>actually keep the current process entirely intact -- what you are
>changing is the perceived process by the users.
>
>Still easy to do.  Keep the definitions as above, make approval of
>applications automatic (you can even wrap the process in fancy FX),
>and then just insert the dissapproved for the ones you don't want. 
>just as much or as little work as the current process I'd wager, with
>the associated benefit of giving you an automated system for removing
>those you don't want without your jurors having to spend any time on
>it.

I don't understand. How do you determine which you don;'t want withotu
lookign at them all?

JK