[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
12904: Re: [MUD-Dev] Trouble Makers or Regular Citizens
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Justin Rogers" <justin@mlstoday.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:21:10 -0800
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
[Todd Wrote]
> offering in the neighborhood of dozens of warnings and lesser =
punishments
> before using that measure.
Ok, both yourself and Matthew have responded to this already. I'm =
not
attacking the use of banning nor am I sanctioning that there aren't =
trouble
makers. I'm just curious as to how far MUDs have come. IRL I have had =
to
put up with a good deal of harrassments, personal threats, and =
inconveniences
against me. However, most of these were due to someone's personal =
attitude
at that point in time and I was reserved enough to realize that person =
would
not perform or attempt to perform the said actions.
You mention that you can ban an IP or a subnet, and I've done this =
myself
more in the realms of my Half-Life gameplay server where I don't have a
chance to do anything about the harassing characters. I can't set per =
player
punishments or anything of that nature. So a ban is my only resort. =
However,
if you can ban an IP at the code level then you can also implement a =
holding
tank for players at the IP level. Throw all the players in a room with =
one
another and let them duke it out, bad mouth one another, fuck around, =
and if
you think one of them has reformed then let him back in the game.
Don't ban them and get them pissed off at you so they talk trash. =
Simply
remove them from the game world and give them a place to cool off. =
They'll
be especially surprised when one of their newbie characters is not =
respawned
in newbie central, but instead directly in the holding tank.
- Justin Rogers, CEO DigiTec Web Consultants
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev