[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
27544: Re: [MUD-Dev] Database vs. Disk
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Peter \"Pietro\" Rossmann" <peter.rossmann@telia.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:12:30 +0200
References: [1] [2] [3] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:
> Using an RDBMS brings with it a standard security model for that
> application, which is nice, but also brings with it a pre-canned
> set of threat vectors for exploits. These can range from being as
> simple as direct attacks on the RDBMS, attacks and attempted
> misphrasings of SQL statements by injecting carefully prepared
> strings, to attacks (even DoS) on exposed network ports for the
Would not a firewall be a solution? If you design the system the
same way as you would design some high-profile business system?
> Sure, things like Oracle are fast and immensely scalable for the
> types of loads they are designed for. Unhappily for MUDs, game
> and world data typically don't fit those load or access patterns
> -- but then I've ranted on this before, not that many weeks ago.
Considering that even NTFS filesystem is based on (kind of) RDBMS
(b-tree with transaction log), and the next generation WinFS will be
actually running on the sql core, i see quite some benefits using
it. The question is only how :)
It probably would take more than just copy/fit the current data to
sql. it would take complete redesign of them.
Peter "Pietro" Rossmann
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev