[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
12442: Re: [MUD-Dev] distributed objects
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Ola Fosheim Grøstad <olag@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:28:00 +0100
References: [1] [2] [3] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
J C Lawrence wrote:
> I'd also note that EverQuest demonstrated the same problem in a
> different manner via ShowEQ. They (reputedly) reverse engineered
> the EQ protocols and data structures via packet sniffing and thereby
> wrote their only rather omniscient client (taking advantages of
> glaring weaknesses in the EQ protocol design).
The funny thing is that you can expect this to happen during the
beta-testing of any promising product, so there will be cheat tools
readily available from established fan-sites by the time you launch your
product.
I guess this is rather obvious, but one should note that in these kind
of subcultures the challenge provides the reward. That is: the respect
of your peers. I suppose it is the same social mechanisms that you
could see in cracked games (removal of copy protection) in the 1980s.
For instance if a product with heavy duty protection was first partially
cracked by one group then it some weeks later would be fully cracked
with cheats added by a rivalling group accompanied with ridicule of the
"lameness" of the first group...
Game designers, why do they dislike meta-games? :^)
Ola.
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev