[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
25801: Re: [MUD-Dev] Is database access a bottleneck? Prevayler.
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Sean Kelly <sean@ffwd.cx>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:31:52 -0800
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
shren wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Josh Goldshlag wrote:
>> 4) Max of 5 simultaneous queries.
>> It might be suitable, if you made sure to limit the number of
>> queries and were careful about database size.
> I hate little things like this, however. It so blatantly states,
> "We're going to sell you crippled software and then when it can't
> limp any farther we're going to hope you're locked in." You know
> that's what they want. I'm not anti-microsoft, I'm
> anti-crippleware.
The 5 query limit could easily be addressed by coalescing DB obs
into a worker thread (which is the type of thing that's generally
done anyway). At that point, you could concievably have a 5 machine
cluster hanging off the database. I don't much like crippleware
either, but this is free software marketed by a for-profit company.
I wouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth.
Sean
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev