[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
12095: Re: [MUD-Dev] Proper liscense for MUD source? Perhaps not GPL... (fwd)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: J C Lawrence <claw@cp.net>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:46:34 -0800
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 19:43:13 -0700
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> That said, a clause equating public connection to the code with
> binary release sounds quite fair, and I'd be interested to see
> such a clause (addition to the GPL I assume?) if you write one...
Such has been suggested on license-discuss (see
http://www.opensource.org/) more than once. The trouble is that it
violates points 5, 6, and 9 of the Open Source Definition, as well
as violating various aspects of the Gnu Manifesto and RMS'es stated
intentions for it.
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw@kanga.nu
----------(*) Internet: coder@kanga.nu
...Honorary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev