[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
21713: Re: RE : [MUD-Dev] Story Implementation
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Matt Mihaly <the_logos@achaea.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:03:00 +0000 (GMT)
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Veynom wrote:
> Matt Mihaly wrote:
>> I strongly believe your approach (which used to be my approach as
>> well) to generating player-led stories will NOT work without
>> worlds that are considerably more complex than any existing or
>> planned worlds that I know of.
> Depends of your definition of complex. If you mean large, then I
> agree. Our universe is a huge galaxy map of 500x500 squares (call
> them G for Galaxy). Each square is also divided into a 10x10 grid
> (call these squares S for System). In each S, you can find planets
> (1 to 9). And each planet is composed of 2500 to 40 000 squares
> where you can build up to 10 000 facilities.
Well, no, I meant complex in terms of the density and diversity of
interaction. For instance, the physical world is quite complex, and
since it all seems to arise from a few basic principles,
_everything_ is fundamentally inter-related. In most MUDs, however,
the systems are built separately and largely arbitrarily. Why can
dragons fly? Just cause they can. Why can't I experiment and build
myself a steam engine? Cause you can't.
> The complexity can be the choice of these options. And in order
> for this to work, the Admins have developed rules more related to
> the physics of the universe than what players can or can not do.
Nod, that's the sort of thing I was talking about.
> Last point, no direct admin interference. In the worse case,
> Admins can only add new small rules or assets allowing to some to
> develop their ideas. Interfering with the game-play is something
> we refuse to do (anymore).
Well, good luck with that...
--matt
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev