[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

2064: Re: [MUD-Dev] New to this mailing list

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 23:59:45 -4
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On  3 Sep 97 at 10:36, Jeff Kesselman wrote:
> Anyone who has watched a significant number fo porn flicks
> knwos that there are maybe 5 sexual acts in the entire repertoire of 95% of
> the pron otu teyhre. lets afce it, Americans have very little imaginaytion
> when it comes to such things.  

Porn flicks are produced by men for men, _generally_ speaking.  One 
could conclude that 95% of American women are lesbians.  One could 
conclude that 95% of Americans are involved in three-way sexual 
encounters.  One could conclude from watching Swedish films that 95% 
of Swedes are likely to practice voyeurism, fetishisms and anal 
intercourse.

Would such conclusions be appropriate?  Are such analogies valid?  
I don't believe so. 

One could easily conclude that American porn film makers are very
unimaginative.

Besides _why_ is it important to know what we are doing in the 
bedroom?  Is there a legitimate reason to gather such information? 
What is the agenda and whose is it?

Jon A. Lambert