[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
18881: Re: [MUD-Dev] [DESIGN] Economy goals (was: Broken currencies)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Vincent Archer <archer@nevrax.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:25:47 +0200
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
According to Derek Licciardi:
> To me vendors and such provide not only a large part of facilitating
> the transaction between players, but money sinks for the
> owners(transaction fees, maintenance costs) and enhanced player
> driven content possibilities.
> I can't see why these can be so bad.
It's not "bad". That depends on what your primary goals are.
If you're looking for a lubricant for the economy, they are very
nice. But if you're looking for is a way to promote player-player
interactions, then they're bad. Because they are essentially an
anonymiser which removes the "other" player from the trade.
Someone mentioned that using a player-run vendor regularly, you end up
meeting the vendor's owner one day. Sure, but that wasn't my point. My
point was: "in what way does the vendor increase the opportunity for
meeting someone", and the answer, for that particular purpose, is
none. It doesn't add to player-player interaction anything that a NPC
vendor (which has no player manager) wouldn't. If you frequent a
specific NPC vendor, you still end up meeting one day the other
regular customers of said vendor.
A player-run vendor is a way to get more customers, but not a way to
meet more customers. It sure is better than nothing :)
--
Vincent Archer Email: archer@nevrax.com
Nevrax France. Off on the yellow brick road we go!
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev