[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

19422: Re: [MUD-Dev] The effects of object oriented servers on the item database (Long)

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Adam Martin" <amsm2@cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 22:38:47 +0100
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Licciardi" <kressilac@home.com>
To: <mud-dev@kanga.nu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:27 AM
Subject: RE: [MUD-Dev] The effects of object oriented servers on the item
database (Long)

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:Chambers
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 12:11 PM
>> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
>> Subject: [MUD-Dev] The effects of object oriented servers on the item
>> database

>> How would you implement a database for the object hierarchy?  Since
>> each derived object would have different properties, you would need
>> very large databases, right?  Does anyone have any tricks or
>> articles about this? Maybe even an example?

> The answer to this problem isn't quite as obvious as the question.
> Will you be using a relational database, and object database or an
> object-relational database?  Do you have the funding to get a real
> database or are you stuck with a freeware or shareware database?
> Both of these questions have significant ramifications on your
> ability to implement a database to support the object hierarchy.

[snipped lots of good intro to relational databases]

Just wondering aloud, but what about other types, such as e.g. LDAP? 
Not that I've ever used it for anything MUD-related, but experience
developing LDAP databases in commericial environments has shown it to
be particularly easy to understand what is going on in the database,
and a lot more amenable to changes than, say, relational DB's (which,
correct me if I'm wrong, are a dog to retro-fit with altered
functionality?)

Adam M

_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev