[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

23631: Re: [MUD-Dev] Codename Blue & Facets - Nick Yee's new studies

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Rayzam" <rayzam@travellingbard.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:47:29 -0700
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
From: "Dave Rickey" <daver@mythicentertainment.com>
> From: "John Buehler" <johnbue@msn.com>
>> Dave Rickey writes:

> But the Bartle Test seems to detect many of them, in the very same
> games that Yee failed to find them in.  Either Yee's methodology
> is mistaken, or that of the Bartle Test.  Your explanation was
> that Yee didn't find them because they weren't there, not being
> attracted to those games, but that doesn't account for why the
> Bartle Test seemed to find them in the same population.  Since the
> Bartle test *assumed* the existence of explorers, while Yee's
> methodology allowed the possibility of disproving them, I lean
> towards Yee's data (disprovability being a core element of any
> valid theory).

The other difference is the sample, i.e. the respondents. Were those
in Yee's study representative of the whole population? Were
Bartle's? If neither were, were they representative of each other?

The thing to do is to give some people both sets, and see how the
scores on each test correlate with each other. That will shed some
light on the issues.

    rayzam
    www.travellingbard.com


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev