[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
7080: [MUD-Dev] Re: Modular MUD
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Holly Sommer <hsommer@micro.ti.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:36:17 -0500 (CDT)
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Mon, 31 Aug 1998, Adam J. Thornton wrote:
> If I'm developing a protocol that doesn't really need much in the way of
> links, would I be better off writing an SGML DTD rather than an XML DTD?
Uhh... my Markup Language knowledge base is rusty by a couple years, but
isn't XML a DTD of SGML, just like HTML is a DTD of SGML? Document Type
Definition - rules of what tags are allowed, the rules of use of those
tags, description of their behavior, etc.? I guess I'm just pedanting and
wondering if the question shouldn't rather be:
...would I be better off developing a DTD other than XML?
My answer would be: yes, if you have the time to invest in it.
-Holly, tossing in her tuppance