[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
3031: Re: [MUD-Dev] PirateMUD and CSL
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 14:19:56 -0700
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
In <199708140053.TAA02282@dfw-ix11.ix.netcom.com>, on 08/13/97
at 07:31 PM, "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc@ix.netcom.com> said:
>> From: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
>> My general extrapolation is:
>>
>> negative values == failure conditions
>> zero value == success/pass
>> postive values == something notable which isn't an error happened.
>>
>IBM has used this sort of call return fairly consistently in many of
>their development products.
Yet another reason for my .sig.
>My first C programs were highly influenced by my mental separation of
>procedures and functions. Those of you who have drunken heavily of
>Pascal can probably relate to this odd state of mind. =)
Its a framing I rather approve of as happens. Its a question of
reduced context or scoping more than anything else. I *like* reduced
context and scoping when applicable (variation on const correctness
and controlled namespaces).
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw@null.net
(Contractor) Internet: coder@ibm.net
---------------(*) Internet: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...