[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
694: Room-based vs. coordinate-based
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: S001GMU@nova.wright.edu
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 18:29:14 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 19:21:15 +0000 (PST8PDT)
From: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
>In <01IK0ROHGSBM90PQJB@nova.wright.edu>, on 06/13/97
> at 09:29 AM, S001GMU@nova.wright.edu said:
>
>[Shoehorn, 2 people and 15 tiny objects.... ]
>
>>I'd be tempted to add a scale to each neighborhood. The scale would
>>be a range of object sizes allowable within that neighborhood.
>>anything too big or two small gets shuffled into a neighborhood of
>>the appropriate scale, creating a new one if none exists.
>>Neighborhoods of differing scale can overlap eachother with no real
>>problems.
>
>The problem is that scale does not denote suitability for receiving a
>message. Should the player currently inhabiting the body of a flea
>not receive the mesage while the troll he's biting will receive the
>message?
A tiny creature has a vastly different range of vision from a giant creature
(in general... yes I know there are exceptions on both sides). A flea on
the rabbit that got pulled out of the hat may only know that suddenly it is
light out rather than dark, and a dragon in the next room may not even notice
that those puny mortals are doing much of anything. What you see is entirely
a matter of scale.
>I don't see that scale offers a value here.
I disagree. :)
>>Are there any glaring problems with that? I've had some difficulty
>>following exactly what you guys are talking about, but that probably
>>stems from not really reading the first couple of messages too
>>thuroughly. Will have ot go back and re-read those. ;)
>
>Marian asked a similar question. I'll attempt to recap later today or
>tomorrow.
Thanks. :)
-Greg