[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
1973: Re: [MUD-Dev] Re:
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Marian Griffith <gryphon@iaehv.nl>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 21:27:16 +0100 (BST)
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Sun 31 Aug, coder@ibm.net wrote:
> On 28/08/97 at 01:16 PM, Marian Griffith <gryphon@iaehv.nl> said:
> >But should it be part of a game?
> Abstracting majorly:
> Are you content with absolutely defining that any in-game structure
> or mechanic should never be part of a game?
> My concentration here is on the concept of "should" and its relation
> to obligation, righteousness (both zealotry and correctness), social
> concience, etc. I am not fond of such generic "shoulds", and suspect
> that they are all unexamined mental comforts,
I think a comment of mine is quoted out of context here. Only I have
erased the original post so I can't go back and look at it. Of course
I could look at the archives but I do not think it is that important?
I probably was trying to point out that because something is possible
that doesn't mean it's also desirable in a game.
Marian (who is rather lost what you're trying to ask in the quoted
message)
--
Yes - at last - You. I Choose you. Out of all the world,
out of all the seeking, I have found you, young sister of
my heart! You are mine and I am yours - and never again
will there be loneliness ...
Rolan Choosing Talia,
Arrows of the Queen, by Mercedes Lackey