[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
20406: Re: [MUD-Dev] DNA Game Patent [was Randy's Resume]
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Kevin Littlejohn <darius@bofh.net.au>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 04:24:02 +1000
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
"Travis Nixon" wrote
> From: "F. Randall Farmer" <randy.farmer@pobox.com>
>> My non-lawyer, non-patentese interpretation of the limitations of
>> the first claim:
>> Two or more _different_ networked (multiuser) games (which MUST
>> include client software) that can use the same objects in
>> similar, but differing ways.
>> Bard's Tale isn't covered. 100% text MUDs aren't covered. There
>> is only a handful of Client-Server games that even existed
>> then. :-)
> I can't speak for prior art, and I haven't seen or tried to
> comprehend the entire patent, but doesn't this seem like a fairly
> obvious progression to you?
> Multiplayer games that interconnect?
More than an obvious progression, it's 1) been discussed lots and
lots by various people in the mud community, for, um, well, as long
as I can remember - people want to port characters from mud to mud,
it's hardly a unique idea, and 2) already in existence in products
like NWN, surely? Even Id Software discussed the idea of portals
from one game to another once upon a time - sure, the mapping
function is _usually_ trivial from one game to another, but there's
always a mapping function of some sort there, even if it's very
close to the identity function.
I don't understand, if that's the patent, how it can be claimed to
belong to them as an idea. But then, I'm patent-unknowledgable.
KJL
--
Internet techie Obsidian Consulting Group
Specialising in proxy servers and traffic measuring/billing.
http://www.obsidian.com.au/ darius@obsidian.com.au
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev