[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

27383: Re: [MUD-Dev] Database vs. Disk

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Bruce Mitchener <bruce@cubik.org>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 00:33:55 -0600
References: [1] [2] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
J C Lawrence wrote:

> First you need to clarify what you mean by a database.  RDBMS?
> Object?  Hierarchal?  Tuplespace?  What?
 
> Assuming RDBMS (as that's the most common form of the question),

That's all been discussed a lot in the past here and elsewhere.

What about spatial databases?

As far as I know, the options are roughly:

    * Use a GIS
    * Use PostGIS
    * Use the R-tree indexing in Postgres natively
    * Use the R-tree indexing in various other DB systems
      such as GOODS, Gigabase, Shore
    * Pay lots of money for the spatial extensions to Oracle, DB2,
      or other commercial databases.
    * Use Hybrid's dPVS.
    * Write your own
    * Do without

What are people doing out there?

  - Bruce


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev