[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
15544: Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: MUD-Dev digest, Vol 1 #216 - 11 msgs
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Ben" <bjchambers@phoenixdsl.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:15:13 -0400
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
John Lambert Wrote:
> Greg Miller wrote:
> > > From: "Madrona Tree" <madronatree@hotmail.com>
> > > But the question is: Should someone be able to volunteer for a
for-profit
> > > corporation? Should for-profit corporations solicit volunteers? I
think
> > > the answer is no.
> >
> > Here, we have a fundamental disagreement. I believe letting people do
> > what they want should be the default. Exceptions should be made
> > reluctantly. Is it really any of the government's business if I choose
> > to provide my services for free?
>
> I agree 100%. I'd also like to point out that the distinctions
> between employee and non-employee are purely regulatory, arbitrary, and
> have ZERO basis in legislative action. As a matter of fact the 20
questions
> asked to determine whether one is an employee or not, are based on the
> feudal obligations of English lords circa the time the Magna Carta was
> signed. In any event the Internal Revenue Service has never provided
> any system or guidelines as to what constitutes an affimative or negative
> response in regards to weighting of the questions or the proportion of
> questions required in determining employment or non-employement. The
legal
> precedence in this area is contradictory and not uniform. I've dealt
> with these employee issues a lot being a contractor and sub-contractor
> for 10 years.
>
I disagree. If they volunteer and are not directly employed in the
money-making,
it shouldn't be illegal. If they want to outlaw volunteers, what happens to
newbie
helper guilds on a MUD, if that MUD is for profit.
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev