[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
8895: [MUD-Dev] Re: DevMUD considerations and the Halloween article
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Chris Gray <cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 21:48:33 -0700
Organization: Kanga.Nu
[Jon Leonard:]
>There are a few design decisions I'm aware of that have far-reaching impact
>on the VM design. Some undecided ones that I'm aware of:
Yep. Others might be issues with string handling (copy v.s. refcount or
GC or something). Locking/unlocking of DB entries (automatic? manual?
none?) Error reporting capabilities, traceback production, what level
of run-time checking is done before byte-code is executed?
>There's nothing keeping us from having alternate VMs, and these are possible
>things that they might differ in. We should definitely decide on one model
>to start with, though.
Makes sense, unless we magically end up with a couple of alternates fairly
early in the game. I'm not being entirely altruistic in wanting to get
my stuff available early!
--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation. - me
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA