[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
10274: Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Ross Nicoll <rnicoll@lostics.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:32:14 +0000 (GMT)
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Just re-read my reply to this message, sorry, shouldn't have gone out in
that state. The last piece was meant to be a prompt for more
information...
--
_ __ __ __
/_) / / (_ (__
/\ /_/ __) /
______________/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 20:03:19 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ross Nicoll <rnicoll@lostics.demon.co.uk>
To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Multi-threaded mud server.
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
[snip]
> > Although, as someone said, making it fast tends to be a good idea anyway;
> > not caring about resources is how we got Windows :)
> I think the NT group has a pretty good bead on multi-threading
> performance. Win32 threads is a cheetah compared to many PThreads
> implementations.
Oh? I'm kinda suprised...
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev