[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
27302: RE: [MUD-Dev] D&D vs. MMORPG "complexity"
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "David Kennerly" <kennerly@sfsu.edu>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:49:57 -0700
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Travis Casey wrote:
> I understand that Phoenix Command, a modern-day-era RPG from the
> same people who wrote Sword's Path: Glory takes the same combat
> system and extends it to modern weapons, but I've never seen it
> myself.
I only played Phoenix Command once about ten years ago. I
remembered a d1000 hit location table that spanned several pages,
specific damage effects, and--basically--roundless combat timing.
It progressed by tenths of a second, with each action taking some
number of these tenths of a second. For example: changing from
prone to standing stance. A few seconds of firefight game-time
became an hour of real-time.
It was intense on tables and formulas:
<http://home.earthlink.net/~phxcmd/pdfs/PCCSeqns.pdf>
And acronyms:
<http://home.earthlink.net/~phxcmd/pccs/PCCSindex.html>
If you're really interested, here's a more detailed report of how a
Phoenix Command combat can go:
<http://www.saunalahti.fi/~ejuhola/7.62/rr1report.html>
A fan said that Phoenix Command was only a conflict resolution
system, not a full role-playing game.
<http://hammer.prohosting.com/~pccs/overview.txt>
Has anyone played a more complex pencil and paper RPG? Or "conflict
resolution system"? I'm just curious as a game designer; I don't
want to resolve how my left eyeball was struck by a glancing blow
from the thirty-fourth fragment of a hand grenade.
David
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev