[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

26013: RE: [MUD-Dev] Requirements for MM (was Complexities of MMOG Serv ers)

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Koster, Raph" <rkoster@soe.sony.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:15:15 -0800
Organization: Kanga.Nu
From: Dubious Advocate
> "Jessica Mulligan" <jessica@mm3d.com> wrote:
 
>> Part of the definition we came up with then was the capability to
>> support a minimum of 125 simultaneous players in the same world
>> instance (server).  It was done that way to separate the field
>> from Retail Hybrids such as Counterstrike, Quake, et al, which
>> have online play but can generally support less than 64
>> simultaneous players on a server.
 
> Under this definition a UO emu like POL or RunUO are MMOGs.

So are most text mud servers.

> I like the current categorized system.  Please consider an
> explicit category for player-managed worlds, or perhaps instead
> add the distinction as a qualifier.  NWN would be the ancestral
> enrollee.

As soon as a player starts managing a world, he's an admin (as he
quickly discovers!). The distinction is irrelevant.

-Raph

_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev