[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

16730: RE: [MUD-Dev] Movies bigger than games? (was Re: Digital Property Law)

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Koster, Raph" <rkoster@verant.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 07:57:02 -0800
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu 
> [mailto:mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu]On Behalf Of
> Matt Mihaly
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:04 PM
> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Movies bigger than games? (was Re: Digital
> Property Law)
> 
> 
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Tess Lowe wrote:

>> Are you sure that movies are way bigger than games? I was just
>> reading the rant dated 3/2/2001 at
  
>>   http://www.game-revolution.com/articles/rants/rants.htm
 
> Yes, I'm sure. These comparisons only compare box office vs. game
> sales instead of sensibly including merchandising, which boosts
> movie revenue way beyond game revenue. Star Wars alone has done
> billions in merchandising. It's where the real money comes from with
> blockbuster movies.

Well, they're also probably counting the games IN The merchandising.

I think this is an apples to oranges comparison, though. If you count
the merchandising, you're actually counting the profit from an
intellectual property, not the profit from a movie. There's game
mechandising too. Do we count the Tomb Raider movie, the Earthworm Jim
cartoon?

On a strict profit comparison, movies and games, games are slightly
ahead at the moment.

-Raph
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev