[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
10853: Re: [MUD-Dev] Containing automation?
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: Greg Miller <gmiller@classic-games.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:19:22 -0500
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
Asmodeus wrote:
> Again, I'm asking "why?" Anything besides the opportunity for lots of
> macroing by the players to advance through that advancement model?
> Unfortunately, IMO, usage-based models make the most logical sense: With a
> straight XP one (like traditional AD&D, for instance), the player
> (amazingly) gets better at doing everything by killing monsters. It
> doesn't matter if he/she/it actually used those skills--they get improved
> anyways. What other advancement models are out there?
Training, in some form or another... I favor a mixture of the two.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/
Conspiracy theorists mistakenly assume others think before acting.
*** Please limit .sigs to four lines and avoid HTML mail or posts. ***
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev maillist - MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev