[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

15346: RE: [MUD-Dev] UO rants

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Chris Lloyd" <crl199@soton.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 00:26:35 +0100
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu [mailto:mud-dev-admin@kanga.nu]On Behalf Of
> Paul Schwanz - Enterprise Services
> Sent: 25 August 2000 19:43
> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] UO rants
>
> > From: "Tess Lowe" <tess@havensong.com>
>

[Snipped]

                                     Nothing, in my opinion, is superior
> > to players making their own judgements about each other, free from
> > interference from an artificial ethical 'scoring' system.
>
> But should a reputation system be based on players' judgements about other
> players, or about characters' judgements about other characters?
>

Why not? A player's opinions and morals are not (lets be honest) too
different to their RL ones. If a character contributes to his clan/race in
some way, then yes, he will be popular. This is an honest picture of how
people see him. If that player also happens to be feeding information to an
enemy clan in secret, who is to know? His trustworthiness, as far as his own
clan is concerned, is unchanged until someone finds out.

C.




_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev