[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

1665: Re: [MUD-Dev] Languages

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Fri, 23 May 97 14:28:10 -0700
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
In <338c1fce.16025866@relay.mnsinc.com>, on 05/23/97 
   at 09:48 AM, caliban@darklock.com (Caliban Tiresias Darklock) said:

>The problem I see in projects built using proper OOP in C++ is that
>the same data is validated over... and over... and over... and
>over... because none of the objects can make any assumptions about
>the others, so they can't ever take for granted that someone else has
>validated the data. If they did, they'd break the whole reuse thing. 

Actually that's what I've been doing with stratight C and procedural
programming for years.  I've always been a big fan of heavy sanity
checking.  Then OOP came along and made it de rigeuer.

--
J C Lawrence                           Internet: claw@null.net
(Contractor)                           Internet: coder@ibm.net
---------------(*)               Internet: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...