[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
19581: Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: TECH: Distributed Muds
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Adam Martin" <amsm2@cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:13:15 +0100
References: [1] [2] [3] <-newest
Organization: Kanga.Nu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Archer" <archer@nevrax.com>
To: <mud-dev@kanga.nu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Re: TECH: Distributed Muds
> QNX might be well suited to a large distributed MUD, however, seeing
> as it has everything built around message passing between threads
> that might be located on the same CPU, a different CPU, or even a
> CPU located at the other end of a network trunk 100km away. When
> you're talking about distributed, real-time systems, QNX comes to
> mind.
Sorry if I'm being thick, but why would you want a MUD to be
real-time?
Adam M
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev