[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
20591: Re: [MUD-Dev] Chances of success (was d20 system)
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Kwon Ekstrom" <justice@softhome.net>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:15:11 -0600
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
From: "Bobby Martin" <bobbymartin@hotmail.com>
> In fact, why go with a dX system at all? If you have some
> familiarity with math, you can use a system that gives you the
> behavior you want, and drop worrying about how it maps to an
> N-sided polyhedron.
*nod* I tend to roll real numbers, but there are some systems where
dice are helpful as a familiar form of number generation. It can be
easily done using a min/max random value of course.
On a similar note, I also have prewritten graphing equations to
"curve" the flow of things like experience. It's really nice to
encourage usage of higher level skills, and fighting tougher mobs.
Note, I don't have a class or real "level" system, so these are
relative terms that people are likely more familiar with.
> Anyway, the gist of what I'm trying to say is, rather than pick an
> arbitrary system and tweak it, why not decide the characteristics
> you want your success system to have and produce an algorithm with
> those characteristics. You may still need to tweak, but then it's
> because you misunderstood what you wanted rather than because of
> unexpected side effects of your system. An added bonus is such
> systems tend to avoid the scalability problems you see e.g. in
> AD&D at high levels (a d20 doesn't have nearly enough sides : )
*nod* I agree that a custom system is likely to be more accurate and
more efficient.
> I can give the details of our success system if there is interest.
I'm interested in more details, your explaination was quite vague
and I'm a fan of anything that can improve the consistency of
systems.
-- Kwon Ekstrom
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev