[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

21093: Re: [MUD-Dev] UDP Revisted

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Travis Nixon" <tnixon@avalanchesoftware.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:14:29 -0600
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Rickey" <daver@mythicentertainment.com>

> The fundamental issues of TCP vs. UDP are very simple, and are
> only indirectly related to "reliability".

> TCP delivers all packets, and delivers them in order.  This is
> good for file transfers and such, because it allows you to stream
> directly from a socket to memory to file system without worrying
> about data integrity.  However, this has it's built-in downside:
> It will *only* deliver packets in order, if you are sending
> packets 1, 2, 3, 4, and packet 2 doesn't make it, packets 3 and 4
> will be held until packet 2 *does* arrive.

Well, see, there ya go.  Now I've seen somebody else state the
in-orderness of TCP as a reason for not using TCP, and implementing
just the reliability part over UDP.

Silly me, read all the incoming messages before replying.

lol


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev@kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev