[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
4468: Re: [MUD-Dev] Introductions and
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: coder@ibm.net
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 97 22:18:29 -0800
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On 13/12/97 at 04:56 PM, Richard Woolcock <KaVir@dial.pipex.com> said:
>Adam Wiggins wrote:
>> [Stephen Zepp:]
>> You're confusing 'name' with description. The situation you describe
>> should look like so:
...
>> ] examine short
>> You take a close look at the shortsword.
>> It weighs around six stones. The blade is about three handsbreath long.
>> The hilt is wrapped in leather. Delicate paterns are etched into the
>> well-worn blade. It could use some sharpening.
>> ]
>> Bubba says, 'Only fifty coppers for that fine item.'
>> ] name sword Sting
>> You will now call the shortsword 'Sting'.
>> ] l in purse
>> You have three copper pieces.
>> ] doh
>> ] return short
>> You return the shortsword to its spot on the wall.
>Out of interest, shouldn't that be "You return Sting to its spot on the
>wall"?
Both would work as "short", and "sword" are descriptive references, and
would only be ambiguous if you possesed other objects those tags fit.
"Sting" conversely is a name, and gives a guaranteed result. The others
are contextual. The same flexibility works in all the other cases and
object types as well.
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw@null.net
----------(*) Internet: coder@ibm.net
...Honourary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...