nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

679: Re: [MUD-Dev] "From Kansas to Oz"

Jeff Kesselman <jeffk@tenetwork.com> said:

>I'm not sure I agree with the distinction btw code lebvel and lib
>level though.  I see little real distinction. MUDEDIT requried a few
>fucntiosn on root, and a single object it talked to.  Thats it.

That's the other cute thing about the OZ model.  The Kansas object
heirarchy could be *entirely* disfunctional (eg someone deleted the
root object and all connection related objects), and Oz would still be
able to work as an active debugger.  The only requirement was that the
server must be alive and capable of serving the DB.

--
J C Lawrence                           Internet: claw@null.net
(Contractor)                           Internet: coder@ibm.net
---------------(*)               Internet: clawrenc@cup.hp.com
...Honorary Member Clan McFUD -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...