[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]
7429: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Koster, Raph" <rkoster@origin.ea.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 20:53:19 -0500
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kylotan [mailto:kylotan@globalnet.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 1998 8:39 PM
> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> Subject: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
>
>
> I don't think there is much point trying to argue 'Game X isn't a
> mud, whereas Game Y is, because...'. With the variety in 'accepted'
> muds, we have enough criteria to call just about anything a mud, if
> we wanted, or vice versa.
>
> So maybe it is a question of 'How 'mudlike' is game X?' Now, not
> many muds will fit -all- the criteria, but most will fit a large
> proportion of them. I propose the following, but I am sure you
> could add to this.
Here's one to add to the list that my wife Kristen (occasional poster)
came up with:
- an expectation that the social experience occurs within the game, and
not outside it.
Thoughts?
-Raph