[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

7429: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Koster, Raph" <rkoster@origin.ea.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 20:53:19 -0500
Organization: Kanga.Nu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kylotan [mailto:kylotan@globalnet.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 1998 8:39 PM
> To: mud-dev@kanga.nu
> Subject: [MUD-Dev] Re: Ugh, IS Diablo a mud?
> 
> 
> I don't think there is much point trying to argue 'Game X isn't a
> mud, whereas Game Y is, because...'.  With the variety in 'accepted'
> muds, we have enough criteria to call just about anything a mud, if
> we wanted, or vice versa.
> 
> So maybe it is a question of 'How 'mudlike' is game X?'  Now, not
> many muds will fit -all- the criteria, but most will fit a large
> proportion of them.  I propose the following, but I am sure you
> could add to this.

Here's one to add to the list that my wife Kristen (occasional poster)
came up with:

- an expectation that the social experience occurs within the game, and
not outside it.

Thoughts?

-Raph