[Home] [Groups] - Message: [Prev in Group] [Next in Group]

nu.kanga.list.mud-dev

8715: [MUD-Dev] Re: PDMud thread summary

[Full Header] [Plain Text]
From: "Alex Oren" <alexo@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: nu.kanga.list.mud-dev
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:35:49 GMT
References: [1]
Organization: Kanga.Nu
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:12:31 -0700, Chris Gray wrote:

} Static versus dynamic binding of function calls as a programming language
} feature I understand just fine. It was those words attached to a question
} about an object model that confused me. The object model and the
} programming language are strongly intertwined, but they *are* separate.

But an OO programming language has an object model as its foundation but there
are language independent object models (COM/DCOM, CORBA, ...)

} Anyway, I agree - having a way to attach function pointers (or whatever
} you choose to call them) to objects is extremely useful.
} 
}  >Now, to multiple dispatch.  Multiple dispatch is what Scott Meyers (More
}  >Effective C++) calls "Making functions virtual with respect to more than one
}  >object".  C++ and Java do not support this paradigm directly but there are
}  >ways to simulate it.
} 
} OK, definitely jargon then. So, like, er, the state of two objects
} determines which function is called for something?

More like the "class" of two (or more) objects.

Have fun,
Alex.