Computer underground Digest Sun Jul 7, 1996 Volume 8 : Issue 51 ISSN 1004-042X Editor: Jim Thomas (cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu) News Editor: Gordon Meyer (gmeyer@sun.soci.niu.edu) Archivist: Brendan Kehoe Shadow Master: Stanton McCandlish Field Agent Extraordinaire: David Smith Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala Ian Dickinson Cu Digest Homepage: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest CONTENTS, #8.51 (Sun, Jul 7, 1996) File 1--About this Issue--From the "Fight-Censorship" List File 2--Re: Australian atty-general investigating Adelaide Inst.'s web site? File 3--Cube approves only restricted Net access File 4--Europeans fight a Net dominated by English File 5--Dutch clamp down on Internet child porn File 6--UK Encryption Bill (fwd) File 7--Response from Singapore on country's Net-regulations File 8--German computer blackmail attempts File 9--F-C Dispatch #16: DoJ files appeal, Supreme Court ho! File 10--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 Apr, 1996) CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION ApPEARS IN THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 07 Jul 96 15:26 CDT From: Cu Digest Subject: File 1--About this Issue--From the "Fight-Censorship" List This issue is devoted to snippets from Declan McCullagh's fight-censorship discussion group. It's by far the best discussion group for First Amendment issues on the Net for news and informed commentary about freedom of speech topics. To subscribe to future Fight-Censorship Dispatches and related announcements, send "subscribe fight-censorship-announce" in the body of a message addressed to: majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Declan McCullagh Subject: File 2--Re: Australian atty-gen invest'ing Adelaide Inst.'s web site? The messages I forwarded earlier earlier about the Simon Wiesenthal Center were accurate: http://fight-censorship.dementia.org/dl?num=3089 The Center is up to its same old Internet scare-mongering. Below, Rabbi Cooper not only decries holocaust revisionists on the Net, he also reminds the Australian public that students can download bomb-making materials! (Obviously the state must censor libraries, wherein the same information can be found.) According to Cooper, this speech that he personally dislikes is why the Australian government must crack down on free expression online. More info on the SWC's other previous net-censorship attempts, including links to ACLU and CDT reports, is at: http://www.gsia.cmu.edu/andrew/ml3e/www/Not_By_Me_Not_My_Views/censorship.html -Declan >The Advertiser, Saturday, July 6, 1996 >Internet target of Nazi hunters >By Anthony Keane > >A controversial Adelaide-based Internet site is being investigated by the >Federal Government. > >Holocaust-denial group the Adelaide Institute is one of two groups that have >been targeted by international Nazi hunters, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre. > >A spokesman for the Attorney-General, Mr Daryl Williams, said yesterday the >Government had received a letter from the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los >Angeles calling for an investigation into whether the Internet site breached >any local laws. > >"We are investigating the claims made by the Simon Wiesenthal Centre," he said. > >The letter says the centre has "identified over 100 different Web sites >which promote racist violence, mayhem and terrorism". > >"Two Australian Web sites have come to the attention of researchers at the >Wiesenthal Centre," it says. > >The Advertiser yesterday logged into the Adelaide Institute site. Excerpts >included: > >"We reject outright that a questioning of the alleged homicidal gas chamber >story constitutes 'hate talk', is 'anti-Semitic', 'racist' or even >'neo-Nazi' activity. > >"We are a group of individuals who are looking at the Jewish-Nazi Holocaust, >in particular we are investigating the allegation that Germans >systematically killed six million Jews...." > >"We at the Adelaide Institute believe that those who level the homicidal >gassing allegations at the Germans owe it to the world to come up with >irrefutable evidence that this happened." > >The other Internet site under investigation, called Al-Moharer Al-Australi, >is based in Melbourne. > >Adelaide Institute director Dr Fredrick Toben said he would welcome the >Federal Government investigation. > >"But we would also like them to investigate the Simon Wiesenthal Centre and >the tradition it comes from, namely the Babylonian Talmud, which is the >moral and legal foundation of modern Judaism," he said. > >"The Babylonian Talmud is anti-gentile, anti-Christian, against everything >non-Jewish and it is full of hate. > >"The Adelaide Institute has put in a complaint to the Attorney-General's >Department that the Babylonian Talmud contains hate literature and is >racist, is full of bigotry, is offensive to everyone not Jewish, especially >to Christians and to every decent Jew who believes in the equality of >humankind, and it needs investigation," > >SA Jewish Community Council president, Mr Norman Schueler, said: "Anything >that tries to rewrite history is not on, so we therefore welcome an >investigation. > >"As far as we are concerned, the Adelaide Institute has promoted things that >are incorrect and are inconsistent with established fact." > > ========== > >The Courier-Mail (Brisbane) Friday, July 5, 1996 > >Jews trace cyberspace 'hatred' to Australia > >By Rodney Chester and Rory Callinan > >The Federal Government is investigating two controversial Australian-based >anti-semitic Internet sites after an alert from international Nazihunters, >the Simon Wiesenthal Centre. > >The centre, renowned for its dogged pursuit of hundreds of Nazi war >criminals, detected the controversial sites as it followed the trail of >far-right groups into cyberspace. > >After locating the sites earlier this year, the centre wrote to the >Australian Embassy in Washington calling on the Attorney-General to >investigate if the sites breached any local laws. > >The sites, one calling itself Adelaide Institute says: "We are a group of >individuals who are looking at the Jewish-Nazi holocaust. > >"We are worried about the fact that to date it has been impossible to >reconstruct a homicidal gas chamber." > >Al Moharer Al-Australi says it "wants to challenge all forms of New World >Order conditioning and thought control". > >Wiesenthal Centre associate dean Abraham Cooper, speaking from its Los >Angeles headquarters, said many "hate" groups around the world had taken to >the Net in the past 18 months to reach a potential audience of 40 million. > >Rabbi Cooper said there were about 100 Web sites around the world promoting >"hatred and mayhem". > >"It is an unprecedented but powerful tool that not only can be used for >good but also be used for evil," he said. > >"Our experience has been that the authorities don't even understand the >technology that well." > >Rabbi Cooper said there had been numerous cases in the United States where >"very bright" students had down-loaded bomb-making recipes off the net. > >One science teacher in Miami "was about one second away from blowing up both >himself and his school", he said. > >The centre, which uses the Web to promote its own cause, has set up a >cuberwatch programme "not because we are opposed to computers but because >we're committed to human rights." > >Adelaide Institute director Fredrick Toben said last night: "We would >welcome any investigation. >"But we would also like them to investigate Rabbi Cooper and the tradition >that he comes from, namely from the Babylonian Talmud which is the ethical >base that he operates on. >"It is used by certain members of the Jewish community as a guide and the >Babylonian Talmud is full of filth and hatred so let him (the Rabbi) cast >the first stone." > >A spokesman for federal Attorney-General Darrel Williams confirmed the >office had received the letter and claims were being investigated. > >Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies president Laurie Rosenblum said he >regularly received complaints from Queenslanders about material on the >Internet. > >He said there was urgent need to censor the Net. > >"The problem is that you have got this technology where some extremist >organisation can print out stuff and transpose it and then hand it out or >publish it in a newsletter," he said > >The Australian Broadcasting Authority is expected to release its guidelines >on control of the Internet today. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 01:49:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Declan B. McCullagh" Subject: File 3--Cube approves only restricted Net access June 20, 1996 HAVANA (Reuter) - Cuban authorities have approved access to the Internet and other global information networks but will limit such access according to national interests, official media said Thursday. The ruling Comunist Party newspaper Granma said regulations adopted earlier this month outlined the need for access to Internet and other world information networks, while observing interests such as ``defense and national security.'' The policy of establishing who had access would be defined by Cuba's interests, giving priority to individuals and bodies with most relevance to the country's life and development, the newspaper said. It did not specify who such people might be, but they are likely to come from approved state organizations and academic and research centres. Information divulged from such global networks should be trustworthy and in line with Cuba's ``ethical principles'', Granma said. A committee regulating the policy on global information networks would be drawn from ministries that will include the Interior Ministry, the Justice Ministry and the Armed Forces Ministry, Granma said. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 22:19:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Declan B. McCullagh" Subject: File 4--Europeans fight a Net dominated by English [While note exactly net-censorship, I'll still link this in to: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~declan/international/ --Declan] BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, 1996 JUN 21 (NB) -- The European Commission (EC) is urging its members to make sure that English, which already has a strong position on the World Wide Web, does not become the de facto language of European online services and Internet systems. According to Nana Mouskouri, Euro Member of Parliament (MP) and perhaps best known as the Greek singer of the smash hit of the 1960s, "Never on a Sunday," the danger is much more than simply seeing languages other than English falling into disuse on the Internet. [...] "I think it's essential that we protect that cultural heritage and make sure that it's not destroyed by the information society which would then be an information society with no content," she said. So far, Mouskouri's campaign has received only the support from the EC, but there is a possibility that the EC could well turn the support into a full fledged campaign, backed by European legislation, something that could have some serious effects on the future of the Web in Europe. (Sylvia Dennis/19960621/Press & Reader Contact: European Commission +32-2-299-1111) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 01:46:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Declan B. McCullagh" Subject: File 5--Dutch clamp down on Internet child porn Interesting concept... -Declan --- June 20, 1996 THE HAGUE, Netherlands (Reuter) - Dutch Justice Minister Winnie Sorgdrager Thursday opened an Internet site where surfers on the world-wide web could report child pornography. ``The web-site provider will ask the issuer to remove the child pornography from the Internet and will report them to the police if they fail to do so,'' she said at the opening of the site, a self-regulatory service from Internet access providers. Child pornography is prohibited under Dutch law and offenders face jail terms of up to four years. Sorgdrager said Dutch input on the Internet formed only a tiny part of the total. The fight against child pornography would only succeed if other European Union member states adopted the idea. The Dutch foundation of Internet providers, which maintains the web-site, said it expected a speedy removal of pornography. ``In the start-up phase we tested the method on a Dutch distributor of child pornography who immediately stopped publishing images,'' said chairman Felipe Rodriguez. ``The web-site will eliminate all on-line child pornography sent from the Netherlands,'' he said. Germany has recently acted against child pornography and racism on the Internet by banning entire discussion groups. This method is criticised by web-devotees who say that this violates their right to free speech. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 14:10:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Computer underground Digest Subject: File 6--UK Encryption Bill (fwd) ((MODERATORS' NOTE: The original headers of this fowarded post were deleted in the compilation process. Apologies to the sender -- jt)) ======== The following was published yesterday in the Engineer magazine in the UK under the headline 'DTI plans for secure telecoms' - ---------------------------- "The government has recommended licensing 'trusted third parties' as conduits of encrypted information sent over public networks. In a white paper published this week, the Department of Trade and Industry has floated the plan of offering licenses to software firms 'known to be trustworthy'. 'It is not the intention of the government to regulate the private use of encryption' says the white paper. 'It will, however, ensure that organisations and bodies wishing to provide encryption services to the public will be appropriately licensed.' Licensed organisations would allow compamies to send sensitive information to customers or other offices. It would, for instance, allow users of the Internet to send credit card details without the fear of them being picked up by a hacker. 'Secure electronic commerce between parties will become possible because they will have confidence in the security andintegrity of their dealings,' says the paper. Issues to be resolved include a 'common architectural framework' across countries, so information can be safely transmitted across boundaries." ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 10:42:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Declan McCullagh Subject: File 8--German computer blackmail attempts -------------------------- Date--Wed, 26 Jun 1996 13:35:25 +0100 From--frank@artcom.de (Frank Rieger) The HERF-against-banks-story from the Sunday Times 3 weeks ago was somewhat overhyped and has a lack of facts.. I have collected some facts on real blackmail attempts performed in Germany on a much lower, but maybe comparable level. Since February 1996 until last week a person named Markus S=F6hnke Ungerb=FChler was calling German banks and corporations, claiming he was a member of the Chaos Computer Club and has hacked the corporate computer system. He claimed, that he has his hands on data that proves tax manipulations and other illegal activities of this company. He also claimed the hacking of several systems in main German press magazines like stern and Spiegel. Ungerb=FChler asked the banks and companies for paying him some 1000 Deutschmarks for giving them the data "back". Another scheme was to ask for payment for removing allegedly planted negative-stories from the press computers. As known by now all of some dozen companies and banks paid in panic reaction for avoiding any press coverage. Only a very, very small minority of victims asked the police for help - after paying. In several cases Ungerb=FChler handed out some disks with the "data" in exchange for the money. These disks were empty. Mr. Ungerb=FChler has escaped in February from an psychiatric hospital, where he was arrested cause of being an proven schizophrenic and blackmailer. He started his activities two days after his getaway. He based in London and operated via some Fax- and Voicemail boxes. The investigation of the case was difficult, cause none of the victims was willing to prove the identity of the blackmailer for the police etc. (Ungerb=FChler used to show money couriers from the banks his authentic passport to prove he is the right person to receive the money) He is definitely not a member of the Chaos Computer Club and is, as far as known by now, unable to hack into computer systems. He is simply a confidence trickster. The case shows, how fast and easy big companies pay, if they fear press coverage of real or alleged problems. They pay to everyone who believable claims to be _able_ to perform hacking or electronic attacks. In the light of this case, I could imagine, that around 40 banks in London City have paid for being not attacked by HERF - without the real prove, that the blackmailers own such weapons. There is a real huge amount of irrationality in computer security issues, especially in the financial sector. It seems like no one trusts his security measures. As I have learned in this case, these security-guys are thinking all the time in a worst-case manner and if the worst case occurs they are unable to react rational. You did not need Schwartau-style doomsday-weapons for getting lots of money - ou only have to be eloquent and know the right buzzwords. Finally the Ungerb=FChler-case was mainly fixed cause of massive activities of an well-known international security company paid by one of the victims, not cause of so good cooperation between police and the victims. Frank (source: partly from Der Spiegel 24.6.1996, http://eunet.bda.de/bda/int/spon/magazin/gesel02.html) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 22:04:49 -0500 From: Declan McCullagh Subject: File 9--F-C Dispatch #16: DoJ files appeal, Supreme Court ho! Fight-Censorship Dispatch #16 --------------- Justice Department files appeal, Supreme Court ho! --------------- By Declan McCullagh / declan@well.com / Redistribute freely --------------- In this dispatch: Justice Department's appeal means long, tortuous process A mysterious "Order on Motion for Clarification" Text of Justice Department's Notice of Appeal July 2, 1996 WASHINGTON, DC -- The Department of Justice yesterday appealed the Philadelphia court's decision striking down the Communications Decency Act, a move that sets the stage for a long, tortuous climb to the Supreme Court. The government's "Notice of Appeal" is a terse, two-page statement saying they "hereby appeal" the "Adjudication and Order entered June 12," the day the special three-judge panel unanimously declared the CDA to be unconstitutional and blocked the Justice Department from enforcing it. Next move is the DoJ's. They have until September 1 to file a "jurisdictional statement" arguing that the Supreme Court should hear their appeal. The Supreme Court doesn't automatically have to accept jurisdiction, notes Ann Beeson, an attorney with the ACLU. "The Supreme Court can still decline to exercise jurisdiction over the case," she says, adding: "They do not have the same kind of discretion they have in a cert petition." All the DoJ has to do is convince the Supremes that there's "still a substantial federal question," says Beeson. "If they're not convinced there is a question, they can decline the appeal." But by all accounts, there's precious little chance of that happening. After Justice files the jurisdictional statement, our attorneys have 30 days to file a response -- and then when the next term begins on October 7, the Supremes will meet to discuss the case. (If the procedure is anything like granting cert, the votes will be cast in a secret conference attended only by the justices and the actual vote won't be disclosed.) The climb to the nation's highest court will be only partly over by then, since the court's decision to consider our case marks the start of the briefing schedule. The government will have 45 more days to file their arguments saying why the Philadelphia decision was wrong; we have 30 more days to rebut. If the Department of Justice -- hardly the speediest bureaucracy in DC -- uses all of their alloted time, the paperwork won't be complete until Christmas. And then the Supremes need plenty of time to digest it. So everyone's best guess is that the Supreme Court will hear the combined ACLU and ALA coalition lawsuits early next year -- just in time for the rescheduled Electronic Freedom March on the nation's Capitol. As I wrote in a recent HotWired column: "The ACLU predicts the Supreme Court will issue a decision near the close of the next term, which ends in July 1997 -- just in time for Congress to try again." +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ THE MYSTERIOUS "ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION" +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ You might be surprised by a mysterious sentence in the text of the Justice Department's notice of appeal talking about a "Order on Motion for Clarification" the court issued on June 28. Not to worry. The judges ruled so vigorously in our favor that the DoJ wanted to be sure the government could prosecute anyone they think may violate other parts of the CDA. "Because of the wording of the court's actual order, they unwittingly called into question whether the DoJ could enforce the provisions of the CDA that we didn't challenge," says Ann Beeson from the ACLU. The Philadelphia court quickly issued the clarification. +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ TEXT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S "NOTICE OF APPEAL" +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA _____________________________________________________________ AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, : CIVIL ACTION et al., Plaintiffs; : No. 96-963 : v. : : JANET RENO, in her official : capacity as Attorney General of : the United States, Defendant. : _____________________________________________________________ AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, : CIVIL ACTION INC., et al., Plaintiffs; : No. 96-1458 : v. : : UNITED STATES DEP'T OF JUSTICE, : et al., Defendants. : _____________________________________________________________ DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that defendant Janet Reno, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, hereby appeals, pursuant to section 561(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, Sec.561(b), 110 Stat. 143, to the Supreme Court of the United States from the Adjudication and Order entered June 12, 1996, as clarified by the Order on Motion for Clarification entered on June 28, 1996, in American Civil Liberties Union et al. v. Reno, Civ. A. No. 96-0963 (E.D. Pa.). Notice is also hereby given that defendants United States Department of Justice and Janet Reno, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, hereby appeal, pursuant to section 561(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, Sec.561(b), 110 Stat. 143, to the Supreme Court of the United States from the Adjudication and Order entered June 12, 1996, as clarified by the Order on Motion for Clarification entered on June 28, 1996, in American Library Ass'n, et al. v. Department of Justice, et al., Civ. A. No. 96-1458 (E.D. Pa.). Respectfully Submitted, MICHAEL R. STILES United States Attorney MARK R. KMETZ Assistant United States Attorney FRANK W. HUNGER Assistant Attorney General Civil Division DENNIS G. LINDER Director, Federal Programs Branch [signed] ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Trial Attorney [signed] JASON R. BARON PATRICIA M. RUSSOTTO Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice Civil Division Federal Programs Branch 901 E. Street N.W. Washington, Dc 20530 Tel: (202) 514-4782 Date: July 1, 1996 --------------- MEA CULPA. In F-C Dispatch #13, I wrote that the Washington Post ran an article "on the first page of the Outlook section bashing "self-indulgent dross" and "crap" on the Net. I neglected to mention that John Schwartz and Kara Swisher had an excellent rebuttal inside. --------------- Mentioned in this CDA update: HotWired column on what kind of net-censorship Congress will try next: http://www.hotwired.com/netizen/96/24/declan4a.html Fight-Censorship Dispatch #13: http://fight-censorship.dementia.org/dl?num=2741 Fight-Censorship list Int'l Net-Censorship Justice on Campus This document and previous Fight-Censorship Dispatches are archived at: To subscribe to future Fight-Censorship Dispatches and related announcements, send "subscribe fight-censorship-announce" in the body of a message addressed to: majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:51:01 CST From: CuD Moderators Subject: File 10--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 Apr, 1996) Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are available at no cost electronically. CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest Or, to subscribe, send post with this in the "Subject:: line: SUBSCRIBE CU-DIGEST Send the message to: cu-digest-request@weber.ucsd.edu DO NOT SEND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE MODERATORS. The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302) or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB CU-DIGEST Send it to CU-DIGEST-REQUEST@WEBER.UCSD.EDU (NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line) Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;" On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG; on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet); and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (860)-585-9638. CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from 1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome. EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown) Brussels: STRATOMIC BBS +32-2-5383119 2:291/759@fidonet.org In ITALY: ZERO! BBS: +39-11-6507540 In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893 UNITED STATES: etext.archive.umich.edu (192.131.22.8) in /pub/CuD/CuD ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/ aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/ world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/CuD/CuD/ (Finland) ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom) The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the Cu Digest WWW site at: URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/ COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts unless absolutely necessary. DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not violate copyright protections. ------------------------------ End of Computer Underground Digest #8.51 ************************************