Computer underground Digest Wed Feb 5, 1997 Volume 9 : Issue 07 ISSN 1004-042X Editor: Jim Thomas (cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu) News Editor: Gordon Meyer (gmeyer@sun.soci.niu.edu) Archivist: Brendan Kehoe Shadow Master: Stanton McCandlish Field Agent Extraordinaire: David Smith Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala Ian Dickinson Cu Digest Homepage: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest CONTENTS, #9.07 (Wed, Feb 5, 1997) File 1--Re - Internet Forum in Italy (CuD 9.04) File 2--Court upholds Internet case as free speech (fwd) File 3--Christopher Schanot sentenced in St. Louis File 4--Cybersitter & Wallace File 5--PROTEST: "Remember the Blackout" File 6--Panel - Copyright and the Net: Is Legislation the Answer? File 7-- The (1997) 7th Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy File 8--The Information Superhighway Transportation System File 9--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 13 Dec, 1996) CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION APPEARS IN THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 23:14:12 -0800 (PST) From: caponi@SSSUP1.SSSUP.IT Subject: File 1--Re - Internet Forum in Italy (CuD 9.04) The CU Digest #9.04 report "Internet Forum In Italy Subjected To Censorship" was incomplete and inaccurate. As owner of the mailing list censored, I would like to offer here more info for a better understanding of the event. Hosted on a server located at Bologna University, the mailing list LISA (Lista Italiana Sull'Accesso a Internet) launched in early 1995 as an unmoderated area devoted to discussion about social, cultural and economic aspects related to the development of the Internet in Italy. In these two years, discussion topics concerned many different issues, such as net regulation, censorship, netiquette and online behavior. As with most of similar lists, sometimes subscribers opinions were strongly different occasionally leading to some sort of personal animosity. In these cases, I called anyone (both in public and in private) to the respect of other people words and invited all users to get along with the netiquette, helding each subscriber accountable for his/her own content, as clearly stated in the charter list. On November 1996, the president of a political association, involved with electronic communications and repeatedly criticized on the list, contacted the University professor in charge of the computer department where LISA was hosted. He asked for an official intervention to stop that verbal criticism, and the faculty member decided to close down the mailing list. No previous attempt to contact myself, the list owner, was ever made: I simply received the notification announcing the list immediate closure. Two days later, I managed to get LISA re-opened at the Utah University. Nobody is questioning the right of Bologna University officials to cancel any hosted list, but this decision (and its circumstances) was a very harsh termination of an open discussion. LISA is an on-going exchange of different points of view: what we were facing was an attempt to restrain uncomfortable opinions, to silence an area devoted to open confrontation on the Net. Well beyond this single event, we netizens must keep close attention to any concealment to stop the flow of free speech. In the LISA case and anywhere in the world, we are forced to deal with attempts to prevent public discussion, to refuse the diversity of opinions. Choosing censorship instead of an open debate is something we will never be willing to silently accept. Laura Caponi Owner of LISA Lista Italiana Sull'Accesso a Internet ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 13:38:15 +0600 From: jthomas@VENUS.SOCI.NIU.EDU(Jim Thomas) Subject: File 2--Court upholds Internet case as free speech (fwd) ((MODERATORS NOTE: The original poster's address was garbled in transit)) By MaryAnne George and Jeff Martin Knight-Ridder Newspapers DETROIT -- Former University of Michigan student Jake Baker wrote on the Internet about raping, torturing and murdering women. But he didn't threaten them -- at least not under federal law, a court ruled Wednesday. Civil libertarians, who feared regulation of the vast reaches of cyberspace, cheered the ruling. But others said it means women's safety will take a backseat to free speech. Ruling 2-1, the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals panel in Cincinnati upheld a June 1995 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Avern Cohn in Detroit dismissing charges against Baker. Cohn had said the writings were constitutionally protected as free speech. Baker, 22, now a computer science major at the University of Pittsburgh, is the first person to be prosecuted for Internet writings in a case that drew a storm of controversy about regulating cyberspace. ................. (c) 1997, Detroit Free Press. Distributed by Knight-Ridder/Tribune Information Services. Copyright Chicago Tribune (c) 1997 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 15:56:49 -0600 (CST) From: Bruce Umbaugh Subject: File 3--Christopher Schanot sentenced in St. Louis According to Saturday's St. Louis Post-Dispatch (Feb. 1, copyrighted article by Tim Bryant), Christopher Schanot, was sentenced Friday by U.S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry. The judge called Schanot "obviously . . . very skilled" and expressed a desire that he not be influenced by others "who may not have your best interests at heart." Predictably, the prosecutor called him a computer genius, and his own attorney noted that he intended no harm. According to the report, Schanot admitted in November "that he had installed secret programs into a Southwestern Bell computer system in St. Louis and in another system in New Jersey, giving him access to the computer files of the seven regional phone companies." SWB and BELLCORE put the cost of "clean up" at US$80,000. The piece reports that the U.S. attorney's office says Schanot originally gained access using a Southwestern Bell employee's account, the employee having given his son access and the son having shared the account information with Schanot. Schanot should be released in about six weeks, according to the article, since he has served jail time and been in a halfway house for four and one-half months. (The sentence is five months imprisonment and six months in a halfway house.) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Jan 97 08:23:58 -0500 (EST) From: kkc@COMPETITOR.NET(K.K. Campbell) Subject: File 4--Cybersitter & Wallace ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WHO'S WATCHING THE 'WATCHERS'? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ by K.K. CAMPBELL Net.column The Toronto Star Thursday, January 30, 1997 One of the most controversial aspects of cyberspace is censorship. A widely accepted solution to eliminating the "unwanted" is self-imposed censorship, through special software which blocks out types of content not desired. The appeal of these programs is that people needn't rely on distant authority to dictate acceptability. We police ourselves; or at least we have some control over how we will be policed. The news media have generally blessed "blocking software" with unexamined sprinklings of warm praise. After all, who dares suggest that stopping your 5-year-old from seeing graphic gore, violence or sex is bad? What could go wrong with that? But, now critics are starting to ask, who is "watching the watchers?" Could these watchers themselves develop more "creative applications" for their power to silence? Could they apply their own personal prejudices, or even their own hidden agendas? Or is that paranoid nonsense? Ask U.S. author Jonathan Wallace (jw@bway.net). Wallace says California's Solid Oak software, which produces Cybersitter blocking software, has added his site to its "block list" in retaliation for critical remarks he made about the company. Solid Oak claims 900,000 registered Cybersitter users. Wallace, a New York-based software business executive and attorney is co-author of the book _Sex, Laws and Cyberspace_ (Henry Holt, $34.95). Net.column will discuss the book with its author next installment. He's also editor of the monthly Webzine _The Ethical Spectacle_, which focuses on "the intersection of ethics, law and politics in our society." The Webzine recently asked readers to not purchase Cybersitter because of continuing reports of Solid Oak's "unethical behavior." "In the book," Wallace says in a press release explaining his current attitude to Cybersitter, "we took the position -- naively, I now think -- that use of blocking software by parents was a less restrictive alternative to government censorship. We never expected that publishers of blocking software would block sites for their political content alone, as Solid Oak has done." Solid Oak unequivocably denies there is a political agenda of any kind et work. "Absolutely, 100 per cent not," Marc Kanter told the Toronto Star in a phone interview. Kanter is Solid Oak's vice president of marketing. "There is no hidden political agenda." Kanter says someone criticizing Cybersitter would not be blocked. He says Wallace's site is blocked because it "links information on how to hack Cybersitter. We do not allow our customers to have hacking information for the program." Wallace told The Star that's not true. "There's no such information on my site, nor is there on Peacefire's. I link to some pages maintained by Glen Roberts, who -- along with some political commentary on Cybersitter, and analysis of its blocking policy -- offers a (legal) work-around. However, since his site is separately blocked by Cybersitter, there is no reason for them to block my site as well." Kanter dismisses Wallace's complaints. "The guy didn't do any homework," Kanter says. "There are a few people who are right-wing activists who are out there that are trying to defame the filtering program. This is what leads to stories like you are doing -- and hopefully you are not supportive of their actions." Wallace didn't know what to make of that. "I've been called a communist, a socialist, and a wild-eyed civil libertarian, but no one has ever called me right wing before," he says. "Kanter has obviously never read _The Ethical Spectacle_." While Cybersitter, with fanfare, claims its mission is to block Web sites containing pornography, obscenity, gratuitous violence, hate speech, criminal activity, etc., an increasing number of investigative Net.journalists also claim Cybersitter, without fanfare, blocks access to Web sites based on political criteria. FOR OUR OWN GOOD This brouhaha began last summer when CyberWire Dispatch revealed Cybersitter blocks sites based on political agenda, such as the feminist National Organization for Women (www.now.org). Dispatch journalist/editor Brock Meeks asked Solid Oak CEO Brian Milburn (bmilburn@solidoak.com) about that. "Milburn isn't shy about it," Meeks reported. "He was outright indignant when he originally told Dispatch: 'If NOW doesn't like it, tough'." Solid Oak threatened to sue Dispatch for its article, but things quieted down. In December, the issue erupted again when 18-yearold Bennett Haselton (bennett@peacefire.org) wrote an article about the company's selection of blocked sites: "Cybersitter: Where Do We Not Want You To Go Today?" (www.peacefire.org/censorware/CYBERsitter.html). Haselton takes computer science and math at Vanderbilt University. "Peacefire" is his own creation, a teen cyberrights group, average age 15. According to various Net.journalists, Solid Oak now threatened Bennett with a lawsuit and even tried to get the Peacefire site booted from its host system (media3.net) by telling Media3 that Haselton was making it "his mission in life to defame our product" by "routinely" publishing names of sites blocked by Cybersitter. (It should be noted it's easy to figure out which sites are blocked, the software provides an output list. Try "playboy.com" -- blocked. Try "whitehouse.com" -- okay. Try "peacefire.org" -- blocked. Try "now.org" -- blocked.) Unsuccessful in his pressure against Media3, Milburn instead included the peacefire.org domain in Cybersitter's block list. On Dec. 9, HotWired picked the story up (www.wired.com/news/story/901.html). NetAction Notes (www.netaction.org) quickly followed suit. Haselton told his story to the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the EFF assured him it would represent him, should Solid Oak deliver on its threat to sue. On Dec. 20, The Netly News (http://netlynews.com) continued the investigation of Cybersitter. Aside from the irony of Cybersitter censoring the newsgroup alt.censorship, it "blocks dozens of ISPs and university sites such as well .com, zoom.com, anon.penet.fi, best.com, webpower.com, ftp.std.com, cts.com, gwis2.seas.gwu.edu, hss.cmu.edu, c2.org, echonyc.com and accounting.com. Now, sadly, some libraries are using it." BLACK LIST TO BLOCK LIST Wallace read the reports of legal threats against the teenager and thought "Milburn was acting like the proverbial 800-pound gorilla." So Wallace added a link on _The Spectacle_'s homepage called "Don't Buy Cybersitter." "I wrote the company," he says, "informing them of my actions and telling them that they misrepresent their product when they claim it blocks only indecent material, hate speech and the like." Wallace says Solid Oak responded by adding his Webzine to its block list. Learning of this, Wallace wrote Milburn and Solid Oak tech support. "I pointed out that _The Spectacle_ does not fit any of their published criteria for blocking a site," he says. "I received mail in return demanding that I cease writing to them and calling my mail 'harassment' -- with a copy to the postmaster at my ISP." Kanter acknowledges this. "He spoke to us more than once or twice -- he continued to send mail -- mail like that is considered 'not wanted' and is automatically sent back." By the end of our phone conversation, Kanter had dropped the "right-wing activist" explanation of who was behind the Cybersitter complaints and offered a new one: "Some of this rhetoric was started by someone we believe to be a highly -- how do you put it? -- a highly homosexual individual, who did not believe we should have the right to block any sites or links to alternative lifestyles. That's how a lot of this got started." Why is the National Organization for Women site blocked? "Very simple. It contains links to gay and lesbian hardcore material. I was on their page this morning, and there is a lot of offensive material linked directly. Just go to their links page and start looking at 'gay' and 'feminism.' Our parents don't want that kind of stuff." I asked if he really meant "hardcore" -- suggestive of full-penetration images/stories. "Yes, by links through links," he clarifies. If someone followed the links starting at now.org, they'd eventually find hardcore sexual material. Kanter says parents are not permitted to know which sites Cybersitter blocks. "That list is not given to anybody under any circumstances -- including law enforcement agencies that have requested it." He says it's to prevent the list from "getting into the wrong hands." It would be a cybermap to naughtiness for some kids. And parents aren't allowed to remove blocked sites from Cybersitter, although they can add to the list. Cyber-rights activists claim the incident underscores warnings they've issued for years: While censorship software may first aim to protect children against "pornography," it can quickly be adopted for political agendas. _The Ethical Spectacle_ is at www.spectacle.org. Solid Oak's Web site can be found at www.solidoak.com. -30- Copyright 1997 K.K. Campbell ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 16:23:21 -0800 From: --Todd Lappin-- Subject: File 5--PROTEST: "Remember the Blackout" THE CDA DISASTER NETWORK February 5, 1997 Greetings! Dave Winer -- a Silicon Valley software developer, essayist, and friend -- passed along a message today marking the first anniversary of the "Paint the Web Black" campaign, which took place almost one year ago, on February 8, 1996, to mourn President Clinton's signing of the CDA into law. Over 5000 Web sites participated in the 1996 campaign -- during which Webmasters were encouraged to blacken the backgrounds of their Web pages to protest the passage of America's first Internet censorship legislation. The campaign was so successful (and so visually compelling) that newspaper and television journalists throughout the US took notice of the story -- showing the world for the first time that the Internet community is capable of rallying as a political force. Dave is planning an event to commemorate this anniversary, so I'll let him tell you all about it in his own words... Work the network! --Todd Lappin--> Section Editor WIRED Magazine PS: I should mention that Voters' Telecommunications Watch and the Center for Democracy and Technology were instrumental in organizing the protest last year, so I want to send them my belated thanks. Like the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union that Dave mentions below, these groups also "deserve and require our support." ================================ Date--Wed, 5 Feb 1997 13:23:14 -0800 From--dwiner@well.com (DaveNet email) Subject--Remember the Blackout --------------------------------------- Amusing Rants from Dave Winer's Desktop Released on 2/5/97; 1:23:14 PM PST --------------------------------------- A short piece, in the middle of much website work, to remind everyone that Saturday February 8 is the first anniversary of an important event in our new medium -- the web blackout of 1996. It's already history. In some circles it's not fashionable to remember that the United States government attempted to censor free speech on the Internet. I believe it would be cynical to overlook it. We defeated the law, even though we re-elected many of the politicians who tried to outlaw free speech in the name of protecting children. I'm building a website that will go live on Saturday to commemorate the protest, and to serve as a monument to the spirit of free speech. To remind us that this is a worldwide community, and no political system has the power to enforce its standards of decency on the medium. The battle to retain our rights is ongoing. Important organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union deserve and require our support. It's easy to lose sight of the principles that we believe in, to be distracted by questions of corporate survival, of fear or greed. These are interesting issues, no doubt. But this is a creative and expressive medium and to protect its potential, unqualified free speech is essential. I played a small role in the web blackout last year. This year I hope to facilitate, to organize more sites and help to spread the word that free speech is not an option, not something that can be traded or limited and that no compromises are possible. If you run a democracy-related site, large or small, please visit the page before Saturday and register. If you know someone who does, please pass this on. And if you value free speech, please visit the site on Saturday or later. It'll be a fascinating trip thru Internet history, if nothing else! Remember the blackout. Remember why it was necessary. Don't let people use children as an excuse to deprive people of their power to express themselves. Dave Winer ------------------------------------------- News & Updates: +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ This transmission was brought to you by.... THE CDA DISASTER NETWORK The CDA Disaster Network is a moderated distribution list providing up-to-the-minute bulletins and background on efforts to overturn the Communications Decency Act. To SUBSCRIBE, send email to with "subscribe cda-bulletin" in the message body. To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to with "unsubscribe cda-bulletin" in the message body. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 22:03:10 -0500 From: Dave Banisar Subject: File 6--Panel - Copyright and the Net: Is Legislation the Answer? Copyright and the Net: Is Legislation the Answer? ACM97: The Next 50 Years of Computing Sunday March 2 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM Fairmont Hotel San Jose, CA Sponsored by the U.S. Public Policy Committee of ACM (USACM) Panelists: Hank Barry, Pam Samuelson, Mark Stefik, Gio Wiederhold Moderator: Barbara Simons, Chair, USACM o What is the role of copyright in all-electronic publication world? Will it be replaced by contract law? o Can the needs of authors who want to publish for renown (academics) and authors that want to publish for pay (entertainment etc) be handled in one mechanism? o Should browsing on the World Wide Web of full copyrighted texts be made illegal because people make temporary copies in their computer's memory when they look at a web page? o Should online service providers, including libraries and universities, have to monitor user accounts in order to enforce copyright laws? o Should firms that compile data have intellectual property rights so that scientists and news reporters can't use the data without permission or payments? o How should existing differences in national copyright be handled in a networked world where national boundaries and are little more than a speedbump on the information superhighway? o Does technological protection for copyrighted works inherently undermine fair use ? These and related issues will confront the 105th Congress in the coming year. They will also be examined by this panel, which will discuss controversies surrounding the extension of copyright law to deal with cyberspace. Examples include: How does proposed legislation reflect the net? How much influence have lobbyists for the entertainment industry had in writing legislation? What should be the role of professional societies in analyzing policy initiatives? We will discussed legislation and international treaties that have been proposed by the White House. We will also examine both technical and legal approaches to problems created by the net, as well as how various approaches might impact the science, technology, and business communities. A significant amount of time will be allowed for audience interaction in the discussion. Biographical sketches Hank Barry is member of the firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati and is Chairman of the firm's Interactive New Media practice group. He represents publicly and privately-held companies in the multimedia, software, computer, on-line and entertainment industries. Hank has authored numerous articles in the fields of venture capital, interactive media and technology transactions. He currently serves on the Editorial Board of the Cyberspace Lawyer. Hank received his law degree in 1983 from Stanford University, where he was managing editor of the Stanford Law Review. Pamela Samuelson is a Professor at the University of California at Berkeley where she holds a joint appointment at the School of Information Management and Systems and in the School of Law. She has written and spoken extensively on the challenges posed by digital technologies for the law, particularly in the field of intellectual property. She is a Contributing Editor of Communications of the ACM and a Fellow of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Mark Stefik is a principal scientist at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. At Stanford University he received a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics in 1970 and a Ph.D. in computer science in 1980. His current research activities are in approaches for creating, protecting, and reusing digital property. Stefik is review editor for the international journal "Artificial Intelligence" and has authored two books on AI-related topics and a third book on the Internet. Gio Wiederhold is a professor of Computer Science at Stanford University, with courtesy appointments in Medicine and Electrical Engineering. His research focuses on large-scale software construction, specifically applied to information systems, the protection of their content, often using knowledge-based techniques. Wiederhold has authored and coauthored more than 250 published papers and reports on computing and medicine. Wiederhold received a degree in Aeronautical Engineering in Holland in 1957 and a Ph. D. in Medical Information Science from the University of California at San Francisco in 1976. He has been elected fellow of the ACMI, the IEEE and the ACM. He currently serves on the ACM Publications Board, focusing on the move to electronic publication. Barbara Simons received her Ph.D. in Computer Science from U.C. Berkeley in 1981. She joined the Research Division of IBM in 1980; she is currently working in IBM Global Services. Simons is a Fellow of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and ACM. In 1995 she was selected as one of 26 Internet "Visionaries" by c|net, and in 1994 Open Computing included her in its list of the top 100 women in computing. She was awarded the 1992 CPSR Norbert Wiener Award for Professional and Social Responsibility in Computing. Simons founded and chairs USACM, the ACM U. S. Public Policy Committee. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 11:26:04 -0800 (PST) From: Bruce R Koball Subject: File 7-- The (1997) 7th Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy The Seventh Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy March 11-14, 1997 San Francisco Airport Hyatt Regency; Burlingame, California Sponsored by ACM SIGCOMM & SIGSAC CFP'97 : Commerce & Community CFP'97 will assemble experts, advocates, and interested people from a broad spectrum of disciplines and backgrounds in a balanced public forum to address the impact of new technologies on society. This year's theme addresses two of the main drivers of social and technological transformation. How is private enterprise changing cyberspace? How are traditional and virtual communities reacting? Topics in the wide-ranging main track program will include: PERSPECTIVES ON CONTROVERSIAL SPEECH THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE NET GOVERNMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL MONEY INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CRYPTOGRAPHY CYPHERPUNKS & CYBERCOPS REGULATION OF ISPs SPAMMING INFOWAR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INFO-PROPERTY THE 1996 ELECTIONS: CREATING A NEW DEMOCRACY THE COMING COLLAPSE OF THE NET CFP'97 will feature parallel-track lunchtime workshops during the main conference on topics including: THE CASE AGAINST PRIVACY HOW A SKIPTRACER OPERATES CYBERBANKING HOW THE ARCHITECTURE REGULATES RIGHTS IN AVATAR CYBERSPACE NATIONAL I.D. CARDS PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURES EUROPEAN IP LAW SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN CYBERSPACE VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES DOMAIN NAMES ARCHIVES, INDEXES & PRIVACY GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF ECASH CRYPTO AND THE 1st AMENDMENT The conference will also offer a number of in-depth tutorials on subjects including: * The Economics of the Internet * Regulation of Internet Service Providers * The Latest in Cryptography * The Constitution in Cyberspace * Info War: The Day After * Personal Information and Advertising on the Net * Transborder Data Flows and the Coming European Union * Intellectual Property Rights on the Net: A Primer INFORMATION A complete conference brochure and registration information are available on our web site at: http://www.cfp.org For an ASCII version of the conference brochure and registration information, send email to: cfpinfo@cfp.org For additional information or questions, call: 415-548-2424 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 00:22:55 -0800 (PST) From: B Jones Subject: File 8--The Information Superhighway Transportation System A while ago I was talking to my freenet's sysadmin and I quipped that freenets are bicycles on the information superhighway. Upon seeing your CuD 9.04 issue, and the item on OS airlines, I was inspired enough (or insipid enough, take your pick) to do what follows. THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: --------------------------------------------------- BBSs: A skateboard. Usually dressed up to look cool, but can't really go anywhere. You hitch rides on cars to pretend to go fast. Only useful as local transportation. Freenets: Bicycles. Not very fast, you can't carry very much, but you can get from A to B, and can do whatever you need to. Usually you end up eating dust from some jerk in a Trans-Am. LANs/WANs: Local bus system. Limited area of where you can go, but you can get transfers to other transportation systems. Ethernet: Highspeed railways. Very fast, but can only go where track exists. Adding new track is expensive, usually only where management decides to build. ISPs: Rental cars on Interprovincial/Interstate Highways. Fast, and you can move a lot of information (think of baud rate as maximum vehicle weight). If you can't afford gas (hourly rates on ISPs) or the monthly payments, you can't go anywhere. ARPA/MilNet: Tanks, trucks, and jeeps. The roads cross military installations, but connect to the highways. AOL: Cars that have unlimited mileage. Only 100 cars exist for the 500,000 users, but no rules exist to force people to share them. The cars can only be taken where the roadmap says you can go, and they often break down. (You still have to pay for using the car, even if you didn't get a chance to. No refunds.) Compuserve: Edsels. AT&T/MCI/Sprint/Cable: GM, Ford, and Chrysler. They haven't built any cars yet, and want a government created monopoly to make it illegal for anyone else to build cars. Netscape/Internet Explorer: GUIded scenic tours of the Internet. A lot of tourist stops on the way, meant only to look good. Lynx: The same itinerary as Netscape/MSIE, but you drive yourself; you're too busy reading the map to see the sights. ARCHIE: Rand-McNally atlas, a photo album, and a phone book. You can find out about the place, but not actually go there. FTP/Gopher: Not a transportation method; actually, it's UPS and Federal Express. Finger: Fodor's guide books. Telnet/IRC: Good old Ma Bell. You don't actually go anywhere, you just connect to the other end. Usenet: A bulletin board in a post office. E-mail: The postal service. (About as slow as the real post office when compared to the Web.) BITNET: A courier service being bought out by the post office. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1996 22:51:01 CST From: CuD Moderators Subject: File 9--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 13 Dec, 1996) Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are available at no cost electronically. CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest Or, to subscribe, send post with this in the "Subject:: line: SUBSCRIBE CU-DIGEST Send the message to: cu-digest-request@weber.ucsd.edu DO NOT SEND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE MODERATORS. The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302) or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB CU-DIGEST Send it to CU-DIGEST-REQUEST@WEBER.UCSD.EDU (NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line) Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;" On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG; on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet); and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (860)-585-9638. CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from 1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome. EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown) In ITALY: ZERO! BBS: +39-11-6507540 In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893 UNITED STATES: etext.archive.umich.edu (192.131.22.8) in /pub/CuD/CuD ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/ aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/ world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/CuD/CuD/ (Finland) ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom) The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the Cu Digest WWW site at: URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/ COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts unless absolutely necessary. DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not violate copyright protections. ------------------------------ End of Computer Underground Digest #9.07 ************************************