From: Hellion@yabbs To: pixy@yabbs Subject: re: Date: Tue May 3 20:09:42 1994 In message re: , pixy said: > Actually, i was taught the conventtions of how to form meter and rythm, > but i doubt that everyone is. Yes, i would agreee that some poems now use > free verse out of sheer laziness. I would even hesitate to consider most > free verse poems--perhaps raw thought would be a better term. some totally > disregard any verse when it could elevate the communication of their > thoughts into a totally different level of experience. with free verse the > content and diction communicate, as does the lack of verse. Many don't > consider the poem something that acts upon many different complex levels, > so what we get is a lot of second rate poetry. > But now on the other hand, look how many people butcher rythm and > meter. too many people just think that the only way to wirte a poem is in > the standard a,b,c,d...rhyme scheme and whatever rythm seems to fit in > with the first line of the poem. Certainly this is not good poetry. Most > of the poetry in unfree verse is just as childish and incomplete as the > free verse. > rythm and rhyme are something that need more consideration from > poets. And no rythm or ryme is still a type of rythm and rhyme and still > requires the same considerations as such. > pixy Okay, here we go off being "professional" poets? Tell you all what, I am a Computer Science Major! Once upon a time I learned a little about rhyme and meter, but I really didn't care much, I write what I feel! If it happens to rhyme, so be it, if not then it doesn't. I guess that I just don't have what it takes to write good poetry! But then again when you are programming 10 - 20 hours a week, you really don't have too much time to think about if it has some rhyme or rythym! I guess if you don't like what I write, dont read it. I just feel that if there are 2 or 3 people out there that like to read it, then I will post it, if not I will just keep it to myself *professional poetry* (spoken under breath) -- Hellion