Received: from casbah.acns.nwu.edu by karazm.math.UH.EDU with SMTP id AA26037 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 23 Oct 1991 12:36:00 -0500 Received: from neworder.ils.nwu.edu by casbah.acns.nwu.edu (4.1/SMI-ACNS-1.03) id AA22344; Wed, 23 Oct 91 12:31:49 CDT Return-Path: Received: by neworder.ils.nwu.edu (4.0/SMI-4.0) id AA00815; Wed, 23 Oct 91 12:22:18 CDT From: newton@neworder.ils.nwu.edu (Dave Newton) Message-Id: <9110231722.AA00815@neworder.ils.nwu.edu> Subject: Re: Transputers... To: glove-list@karazm.math.uh.edu Date: Wed, 23 Oct 91 12:22:17 CDT In-Reply-To: <9110231622.AA28492@alfred.math.utah.edu>; from "dirish@math.utah.edu" at Oct 23, 91 10:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] In a previous message, dirish@math.utah.edu said: > (Just an aside, there really isn't an assembly language for the transputer. That strikes me as odd, since the $396 T400 board I mentioned comes with C, Occam, and assembly. > However, I haven't given up on the transputer. If you have addresses > for companies which are selling PC transputer cards I would love it if > you sent them to me. > The only question is whether 100Mbps interconnect is fast enough. Um, I would certainly hope so. That two-page article about the VPL thing was using straight ethernet for their interconnects. If 100M isn't fast enough, there's a serious software problem, I'd have to say.